Serialization

Beyond accessing model attributes directly via their field names (e.g. model.foobar), models can be converted, dumped, serialized, and exported in a number of ways.

Serialize versus dump

Pydantic uses the terms "serialize" and "dump" interchangeably. Both refer to the process of converting a model to a dictionary or JSON-encoded string.

Outside of Pydantic, the word "serialize" usually refers to converting in-memory data into a string or bytes. However, in the context of Pydantic, there is a very close relationship between converting an object from a more structured form — such as a Pydantic model, a dataclass, etc. — into a less structured form comprised of Python built-ins such as dict.

While we could (and on occasion, do) distinguish between these scenarios by using the word "dump" when converting to primitives and "serialize" when converting to string, for practical purposes, we frequently use the word "serialize" to refer to both of these situations, even though it does not always imply conversion to a string or bytes.

`model.model_dump(...)` ¶

API Documentation

pydantic.main.BaseModel.model_dump

This is the primary way of converting a model to a dictionary. Sub-models will be recursively converted to dictionaries.

Note

The one exception to sub-models being converted to dictionaries is that RootModel and its subclasses will have the root field value dumped directly, without a wrapping dictionary. This is also done recursively.

Note

You can use computed fields to include property and cached_property data in the model.model_dump(...) output.

Example:

from typing import Any, List, Optional

from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, Json


class BarModel(BaseModel):
    whatever: int


class FooBarModel(BaseModel):
    banana: Optional[float] = 1.1
    foo: str = Field(serialization_alias='foo_alias')
    bar: BarModel


m = FooBarModel(banana=3.14, foo='hello', bar={'whatever': 123})

# returns a dictionary:
print(m.model_dump())
#> {'banana': 3.14, 'foo': 'hello', 'bar': {'whatever': 123}}
print(m.model_dump(include={'foo', 'bar'}))
#> {'foo': 'hello', 'bar': {'whatever': 123}}
print(m.model_dump(exclude={'foo', 'bar'}))
#> {'banana': 3.14}
print(m.model_dump(by_alias=True))
#> {'banana': 3.14, 'foo_alias': 'hello', 'bar': {'whatever': 123}}
print(
    FooBarModel(foo='hello', bar={'whatever': 123}).model_dump(
        exclude_unset=True
    )
)
#> {'foo': 'hello', 'bar': {'whatever': 123}}
print(
    FooBarModel(banana=1.1, foo='hello', bar={'whatever': 123}).model_dump(
        exclude_defaults=True
    )
)
#> {'foo': 'hello', 'bar': {'whatever': 123}}
print(
    FooBarModel(foo='hello', bar={'whatever': 123}).model_dump(
        exclude_defaults=True
    )
)
#> {'foo': 'hello', 'bar': {'whatever': 123}}
print(
    FooBarModel(banana=None, foo='hello', bar={'whatever': 123}).model_dump(
        exclude_none=True
    )
)
#> {'foo': 'hello', 'bar': {'whatever': 123}}


class Model(BaseModel):
    x: List[Json[Any]]


print(Model(x=['{"a": 1}', '[1, 2]']).model_dump())
#> {'x': [{'a': 1}, [1, 2]]}
print(Model(x=['{"a": 1}', '[1, 2]']).model_dump(round_trip=True))
#> {'x': ['{"a":1}', '[1,2]']}

`model.model_dump_json(...)` ¶

API Documentation

pydantic.main.BaseModel.model_dump_json

The .model_dump_json() method serializes a model directly to a JSON-encoded string that is equivalent to the result produced by .model_dump().

See arguments for more information.

Note

Pydantic can serialize many commonly used types to JSON that would otherwise be incompatible with a simple json.dumps(foobar) (e.g. datetime, date or UUID) .

from datetime import datetime

from pydantic import BaseModel


class BarModel(BaseModel):
    whatever: int


class FooBarModel(BaseModel):
    foo: datetime
    bar: BarModel


m = FooBarModel(foo=datetime(2032, 6, 1, 12, 13, 14), bar={'whatever': 123})
print(m.model_dump_json())
#> {"foo":"2032-06-01T12:13:14","bar":{"whatever":123}}
print(m.model_dump_json(indent=2))
"""
{
  "foo": "2032-06-01T12:13:14",
  "bar": {
    "whatever": 123
  }
}
"""

`dict(model)` and iteration¶

Pydantic models can also be converted to dictionaries using dict(model), and you can also iterate over a model's fields using for field_name, field_value in model:. With this approach the raw field values are returned, so sub-models will not be converted to dictionaries.

Example:

from pydantic import BaseModel


class BarModel(BaseModel):
    whatever: int


class FooBarModel(BaseModel):
    banana: float
    foo: str
    bar: BarModel


m = FooBarModel(banana=3.14, foo='hello', bar={'whatever': 123})

print(dict(m))
#> {'banana': 3.14, 'foo': 'hello', 'bar': BarModel(whatever=123)}
for name, value in m:
    print(f'{name}: {value}')
    #> banana: 3.14
    #> foo: hello
    #> bar: whatever=123

Note also that RootModel does get converted to a dictionary with the key 'root'.

Custom serializers¶

Pydantic provides several functional serializers to customise how a model is serialized to a dictionary or JSON.

Serialization can be customised on a field using the @field_serializer decorator, and on a model using the @model_serializer decorator.

from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
from typing import Any, Dict

from pydantic import BaseModel, ConfigDict, field_serializer, model_serializer


class WithCustomEncoders(BaseModel):
    model_config = ConfigDict(ser_json_timedelta='iso8601')

    dt: datetime
    diff: timedelta

    @field_serializer('dt')
    def serialize_dt(self, dt: datetime, _info):
        return dt.timestamp()


m = WithCustomEncoders(
    dt=datetime(2032, 6, 1, tzinfo=timezone.utc), diff=timedelta(hours=100)
)
print(m.model_dump_json())
#> {"dt":1969660800.0,"diff":"P4DT4H"}


class Model(BaseModel):
    x: str

    @model_serializer
    def ser_model(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        return {'x': f'serialized {self.x}'}


print(Model(x='test value').model_dump_json())
#> {"x":"serialized test value"}

Note

A single serializer can also be called on all fields by passing the special value '*' to the @field_serializer decorator.

In addition, PlainSerializer and WrapSerializer enable you to use a function to modify the output of serialization.

Both serializers accept optional arguments including:

return_type specifies the return type for the function. If omitted it will be inferred from the type annotation.
when_used specifies when this serializer should be used. Accepts a string with values 'always', 'unless-none', 'json', and 'json-unless-none'. Defaults to 'always'.

PlainSerializer uses a simple function to modify the output of serialization.

from typing_extensions import Annotated

from pydantic import BaseModel
from pydantic.functional_serializers import PlainSerializer

FancyInt = Annotated[
    int, PlainSerializer(lambda x: f'{x:,}', return_type=str, when_used='json')
]


class MyModel(BaseModel):
    x: FancyInt


print(MyModel(x=1234).model_dump())
#> {'x': 1234}

print(MyModel(x=1234).model_dump(mode='json'))
#> {'x': '1,234'}

WrapSerializer receives the raw inputs along with a handler function that applies the standard serialization logic, and can modify the resulting value before returning it as the final output of serialization.

from typing import Any

from typing_extensions import Annotated

from pydantic import BaseModel, SerializerFunctionWrapHandler
from pydantic.functional_serializers import WrapSerializer


def ser_wrap(v: Any, nxt: SerializerFunctionWrapHandler) -> str:
    return f'{nxt(v + 1):,}'


FancyInt = Annotated[int, WrapSerializer(ser_wrap, when_used='json')]


class MyModel(BaseModel):
    x: FancyInt


print(MyModel(x=1234).model_dump())
#> {'x': 1234}

print(MyModel(x=1234).model_dump(mode='json'))
#> {'x': '1,235'}

Overriding the return type when dumping a model¶

While the return value of .model_dump() can usually be described as dict[str, Any], through the use of @model_serializer you can actually cause it to return a value that doesn't match this signature:

from pydantic import BaseModel, model_serializer


class Model(BaseModel):
    x: str

    @model_serializer
    def ser_model(self) -> str:
        return self.x


print(Model(x='not a dict').model_dump())
#> not a dict

If you want to do this and still get proper type-checking for this method, you can override .model_dump() in an if TYPE_CHECKING: block:

from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Literal

from pydantic import BaseModel, model_serializer


class Model(BaseModel):
    x: str

    @model_serializer
    def ser_model(self) -> str:
        return self.x

    if TYPE_CHECKING:
        # Ensure type checkers see the correct return type
        def model_dump(
            self,
            *,
            mode: Literal['json', 'python'] | str = 'python',
            include: Any = None,
            exclude: Any = None,
            by_alias: bool = False,
            exclude_unset: bool = False,
            exclude_defaults: bool = False,
            exclude_none: bool = False,
            round_trip: bool = False,
            warnings: bool = True,
        ) -> str: ...

This trick is actually used in RootModel for precisely this purpose.

Serializing subclasses¶

Subclasses of standard types¶

Subclasses of standard types are automatically dumped like their super-classes:

from datetime import date, timedelta
from typing import Any, Type

from pydantic_core import core_schema

from pydantic import BaseModel, GetCoreSchemaHandler


class DayThisYear(date):
    """
    Contrived example of a special type of date that
    takes an int and interprets it as a day in the current year
    """

    @classmethod
    def __get_pydantic_core_schema__(
        cls, source: Type[Any], handler: GetCoreSchemaHandler
    ) -> core_schema.CoreSchema:
        return core_schema.no_info_after_validator_function(
            cls.validate,
            core_schema.int_schema(),
            serialization=core_schema.format_ser_schema('%Y-%m-%d'),
        )

    @classmethod
    def validate(cls, v: int):
        return date(2023, 1, 1) + timedelta(days=v)


class FooModel(BaseModel):
    date: DayThisYear


m = FooModel(date=300)
print(m.model_dump_json())
#> {"date":"2023-10-28"}

Subclass instances for fields of `BaseModel`, dataclasses, `TypedDict`¶

When using fields whose annotations are themselves struct-like types (e.g., BaseModel subclasses, dataclasses, etc.), the default behavior is to serialize the attribute value as though it was an instance of the annotated type, even if it is a subclass. More specifically, only the fields from the annotated type will be included in the dumped object:

from pydantic import BaseModel


class User(BaseModel):
    name: str


class UserLogin(User):
    password: str


class OuterModel(BaseModel):
    user: User


user = UserLogin(name='pydantic', password='hunter2')

m = OuterModel(user=user)
print(m)
#> user=UserLogin(name='pydantic', password='hunter2')
print(m.model_dump())  # note: the password field is not included
#> {'user': {'name': 'pydantic'}}

Migration Warning

This behavior is different from how things worked in Pydantic V1, where we would always include all (subclass) fields when recursively dumping models to dicts. The motivation behind this change in behavior is that it helps ensure that you know precisely which fields could be included when serializing, even if subclasses get passed when instantiating the object. In particular, this can help prevent surprises when adding sensitive information like secrets as fields of subclasses.

Serializing with duck-typing 🦆¶

What is serialization with duck typing?

Duck-typing serialization is the behavior of serializing an object based on the fields present in the object itself, rather than the fields present in the schema of the object. This means that when an object is serialized, fields present in a subclass, but not in the original schema, will be included in the serialized output.

This behavior was the default in Pydantic V1, but was changed in V2 to help ensure that you know precisely which fields would be included when serializing, even if subclasses get passed when instantiating the object. This helps prevent security risks when serializing subclasses with sensitive information, for example.

If you want v1-style duck-typing serialization behavior, you can use a runtime setting, or annotate individual types.

Field / type level: use the SerializeAsAny annotation
Runtime level: use the serialize_as_any flag when calling model_dump() or model_dump_json()

We discuss these options below in more detail:

`SerializeAsAny` annotation:¶

If you want duck-typing serialization behavior, this can be done using the SerializeAsAny annotation on a type:

from pydantic import BaseModel, SerializeAsAny


class User(BaseModel):
    name: str


class UserLogin(User):
    password: str


class OuterModel(BaseModel):
    as_any: SerializeAsAny[User]
    as_user: User


user = UserLogin(name='pydantic', password='password')

print(OuterModel(as_any=user, as_user=user).model_dump())
"""
{
    'as_any': {'name': 'pydantic', 'password': 'password'},
    'as_user': {'name': 'pydantic'},
}
"""

When a field is annotated as SerializeAsAny[<SomeType>], the validation behavior will be the same as if it was annotated as <SomeType>, and type-checkers like mypy will treat the attribute as having the appropriate type as well. But when serializing, the field will be serialized as though the type hint for the field was Any, which is where the name comes from.

`serialize_as_any` runtime setting¶

The serialize_as_any runtime setting can be used to serialize model data with or without duck typed serialization behavior. serialize_as_any can be passed as a keyword argument to the model_dump() and model_dump_json methods of BaseModels and RootModels. It can also be passed as a keyword argument to the dump_python() and dump_json() methods of TypeAdapters.

If serialize_as_any is set to True, the model will be serialized using duck typed serialization behavior, which means that the model will ignore the schema and instead ask the object itself how it should be serialized. In particular, this means that when model subclasses are serialized, fields present in the subclass but not in the original schema will be included.

If serialize_as_any is set to False (which is the default), the model will be serialized using the schema, which means that fields present in a subclass but not in the original schema will be ignored.

Why is this flag useful?

Sometimes, you want to make sure that no matter what fields might have been added in subclasses, the serialized object will only have the fields listed in the original type definition. This can be useful if you add something like a password: str field in a subclass that you don't want to accidentally include in the serialized output.

For example:

from pydantic import BaseModel


class User(BaseModel):
    name: str


class UserLogin(User):
    password: str


class OuterModel(BaseModel):
    user1: User
    user2: User


user = UserLogin(name='pydantic', password='password')

outer_model = OuterModel(user1=user, user2=user)
print(outer_model.model_dump(serialize_as_any=True))  # (1)!
"""
{
    'user1': {'name': 'pydantic', 'password': 'password'},
    'user2': {'name': 'pydantic', 'password': 'password'},
}
"""

print(outer_model.model_dump(serialize_as_any=False))  # (2)!
#> {'user1': {'name': 'pydantic'}, 'user2': {'name': 'pydantic'}}

With serialize_as_any set to True, the result matches that of V1.
With serialize_as_any set to False (the V2 default), fields present on the subclass, but not the base class, are not included in serialization.

This setting even takes effect with nested and recursive patterns as well. For example:

Python 3.8 and abovePython 3.9 and above

from typing import List

from pydantic import BaseModel


class User(BaseModel):
    name: str
    friends: List['User']


class UserLogin(User):
    password: str


class OuterModel(BaseModel):
    user: User


user = UserLogin(
    name='samuel',
    password='pydantic-pw',
    friends=[UserLogin(name='sebastian', password='fastapi-pw', friends=[])],
)

print(OuterModel(user=user).model_dump(serialize_as_any=True))  # (1)!
"""
{
    'user': {
        'name': 'samuel',
        'friends': [
            {'name': 'sebastian', 'friends': [], 'password': 'fastapi-pw'}
        ],
        'password': 'pydantic-pw',
    }
}
"""

print(OuterModel(user=user).model_dump(serialize_as_any=False))  # (2)!
"""
{'user': {'name': 'samuel', 'friends': [{'name': 'sebastian', 'friends': []}]}}
"""

Even nested User model instances are dumped with fields unique to User subclasses.
Even nested User model instances are dumped without fields unique to User subclasses.

from pydantic import BaseModel


class User(BaseModel):
    name: str
    friends: list['User']


class UserLogin(User):
    password: str


class OuterModel(BaseModel):
    user: User


user = UserLogin(
    name='samuel',
    password='pydantic-pw',
    friends=[UserLogin(name='sebastian', password='fastapi-pw', friends=[])],
)

print(OuterModel(user=user).model_dump(serialize_as_any=True))  # (1)!
"""
{
    'user': {
        'name': 'samuel',
        'friends': [
            {'name': 'sebastian', 'friends': [], 'password': 'fastapi-pw'}
        ],
        'password': 'pydantic-pw',
    }
}
"""

print(OuterModel(user=user).model_dump(serialize_as_any=False))  # (2)!
"""
{'user': {'name': 'samuel', 'friends': [{'name': 'sebastian', 'friends': []}]}}
"""

Even nested User model instances are dumped with fields unique to User subclasses.
Even nested User model instances are dumped without fields unique to User subclasses.

Note

The behavior of the serialize_as_any runtime flag is almost the same as the behavior of the SerializeAsAny annotation. There are a few nuanced differences that we're working to resolve, but for the most part, you can expect the same behavior from both. See more about the differences in this active issue

Overriding the `serialize_as_any` default (False)¶

You can override the default setting for serialize_as_any by configuring a subclass of BaseModel that overrides the default for the serialize_as_any argument to model_dump() and model_dump_json(), and then use that as the base class (instead of pydantic.BaseModel) for any model you want to have this default behavior.

For example, you could do the following if you want to use duck-typing serialization by default:

Python 3.8 and abovePython 3.9 and above

from typing import Any, Dict

from pydantic import BaseModel, SecretStr


class MyBaseModel(BaseModel):
    def model_dump(self, **kwargs) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        return super().model_dump(serialize_as_any=True, **kwargs)

    def model_dump_json(self, **kwargs) -> str:
        return super().model_dump_json(serialize_as_any=True, **kwargs)


class User(MyBaseModel):
    name: str


class UserInfo(User):
    password: SecretStr


class OuterModel(MyBaseModel):
    user: User


u = OuterModel(user=UserInfo(name='John', password='secret_pw'))
print(u.model_dump_json())  # (1)!
#> {"user":{"name":"John","password":"**********"}}

By default, model_dump_json will use duck-typing serialization behavior, which means that the password field is included in the output.

from typing import Any

from pydantic import BaseModel, SecretStr


class MyBaseModel(BaseModel):
    def model_dump(self, **kwargs) -> dict[str, Any]:
        return super().model_dump(serialize_as_any=True, **kwargs)

    def model_dump_json(self, **kwargs) -> str:
        return super().model_dump_json(serialize_as_any=True, **kwargs)


class User(MyBaseModel):
    name: str


class UserInfo(User):
    password: SecretStr


class OuterModel(MyBaseModel):
    user: User


u = OuterModel(user=UserInfo(name='John', password='secret_pw'))
print(u.model_dump_json())  # (1)!
#> {"user":{"name":"John","password":"**********"}}

By default, model_dump_json will use duck-typing serialization behavior, which means that the password field is included in the output.

`pickle.dumps(model)`¶

Pydantic models support efficient pickling and unpickling.

import pickle

from pydantic import BaseModel


class FooBarModel(BaseModel):
    a: str
    b: int


m = FooBarModel(a='hello', b=123)
print(m)
#> a='hello' b=123
data = pickle.dumps(m)
print(data[:20])
#> b'\x80\x04\x95\x95\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x8c\x08__main_'
m2 = pickle.loads(data)
print(m2)
#> a='hello' b=123

Advanced include and exclude¶

The model_dump and model_dump_json methods support include and exclude arguments which can either be sets or dictionaries. This allows nested selection of which fields to export:

from pydantic import BaseModel, SecretStr


class User(BaseModel):
    id: int
    username: str
    password: SecretStr


class Transaction(BaseModel):
    id: str
    user: User
    value: int


t = Transaction(
    id='1234567890',
    user=User(id=42, username='JohnDoe', password='hashedpassword'),
    value=9876543210,
)

# using a set:
print(t.model_dump(exclude={'user', 'value'}))
#> {'id': '1234567890'}

# using a dict:
print(t.model_dump(exclude={'user': {'username', 'password'}, 'value': True}))
#> {'id': '1234567890', 'user': {'id': 42}}

print(t.model_dump(include={'id': True, 'user': {'id'}}))
#> {'id': '1234567890', 'user': {'id': 42}}

Using True indicates that we want to exclude or include an entire key, just as if we included it in a set (note that using False isn't supported). This can be done at any depth level.

Special care must be taken when including or excluding fields from a list or tuple of submodels or dictionaries. In this scenario, model_dump and related methods expect integer keys for element-wise inclusion or exclusion. To exclude a field from every member of a list or tuple, the dictionary key '__all__' can be used, as shown here:

import datetime
from typing import List

from pydantic import BaseModel, SecretStr


class Country(BaseModel):
    name: str
    phone_code: int


class Address(BaseModel):
    post_code: int
    country: Country


class CardDetails(BaseModel):
    number: SecretStr
    expires: datetime.date


class Hobby(BaseModel):
    name: str
    info: str


class User(BaseModel):
    first_name: str
    second_name: str
    address: Address
    card_details: CardDetails
    hobbies: List[Hobby]


user = User(
    first_name='John',
    second_name='Doe',
    address=Address(
        post_code=123456, country=Country(name='USA', phone_code=1)
    ),
    card_details=CardDetails(
        number='4212934504460000', expires=datetime.date(2020, 5, 1)
    ),
    hobbies=[
        Hobby(name='Programming', info='Writing code and stuff'),
        Hobby(name='Gaming', info='Hell Yeah!!!'),
    ],
)

exclude_keys = {
    'second_name': True,
    'address': {'post_code': True, 'country': {'phone_code'}},
    'card_details': True,
    # You can exclude fields from specific members of a tuple/list by index:
    'hobbies': {-1: {'info'}},
}

include_keys = {
    'first_name': True,
    'address': {'country': {'name'}},
    'hobbies': {0: True, -1: {'name'}},
}

# would be the same as user.model_dump(exclude=exclude_keys) in this case:
print(user.model_dump(include=include_keys))
"""
{
    'first_name': 'John',
    'address': {'country': {'name': 'USA'}},
    'hobbies': [
        {'name': 'Programming', 'info': 'Writing code and stuff'},
        {'name': 'Gaming'},
    ],
}
"""

# To exclude a field from all members of a nested list or tuple, use "__all__":
print(user.model_dump(exclude={'hobbies': {'__all__': {'info'}}}))
"""
{
    'first_name': 'John',
    'second_name': 'Doe',
    'address': {
        'post_code': 123456,
        'country': {'name': 'USA', 'phone_code': 1},
    },
    'card_details': {
        'number': SecretStr('**********'),
        'expires': datetime.date(2020, 5, 1),
    },
    'hobbies': [{'name': 'Programming'}, {'name': 'Gaming'}],
}
"""

The same holds for the model_dump_json method.

Model- and field-level include and exclude¶

In addition to the explicit arguments exclude and include passed to model_dump and model_dump_json methods, we can also pass the exclude: bool arguments directly to the Field constructor:

Setting exclude on the field constructor (Field(..., exclude=True)) takes priority over the exclude/include on model_dump and model_dump_json:

from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, SecretStr


class User(BaseModel):
    id: int
    username: str
    password: SecretStr = Field(..., exclude=True)


class Transaction(BaseModel):
    id: str
    value: int = Field(exclude=True)


t = Transaction(
    id='1234567890',
    value=9876543210,
)

print(t.model_dump())
#> {'id': '1234567890'}
print(t.model_dump(include={'id': True, 'value': True}))  # (1)!
#> {'id': '1234567890'}

value excluded from the output because it excluded in Field.

That being said, setting exclude on the field constructor (Field(..., exclude=True)) does not take priority over the exclude_unset, exclude_none, and exclude_default parameters on model_dump and model_dump_json:

Python 3.8 and abovePython 3.10 and above

from typing import Optional

from pydantic import BaseModel, Field


class Person(BaseModel):
    name: str
    age: Optional[int] = Field(None, exclude=False)


person = Person(name='Jeremy')

print(person.model_dump())
#> {'name': 'Jeremy', 'age': None}
print(person.model_dump(exclude_none=True))  # (1)!
#> {'name': 'Jeremy'}
print(person.model_dump(exclude_unset=True))  # (2)!
#> {'name': 'Jeremy'}
print(person.model_dump(exclude_defaults=True))  # (3)!
#> {'name': 'Jeremy'}

age excluded from the output because exclude_none was set to True, and age is None.
age excluded from the output because exclude_unset was set to True, and age was not set in the Person constructor.
age excluded from the output because exclude_defaults was set to True, and age takes the default value of None.

from pydantic import BaseModel, Field


class Person(BaseModel):
    name: str
    age: int | None = Field(None, exclude=False)


person = Person(name='Jeremy')

print(person.model_dump())
#> {'name': 'Jeremy', 'age': None}
print(person.model_dump(exclude_none=True))  # (1)!
#> {'name': 'Jeremy'}
print(person.model_dump(exclude_unset=True))  # (2)!
#> {'name': 'Jeremy'}
print(person.model_dump(exclude_defaults=True))  # (3)!
#> {'name': 'Jeremy'}

age excluded from the output because exclude_none was set to True, and age is None.
age excluded from the output because exclude_unset was set to True, and age was not set in the Person constructor.
age excluded from the output because exclude_defaults was set to True, and age takes the default value of None.

Serialization Context¶

You can pass a context object to the serialization methods which can be accessed from the info argument to decorated serializer functions. This is useful when you need to dynamically update the serialization behavior during runtime. For example, if you wanted a field to be dumped depending on a dynamically controllable set of allowed values, this could be done by passing the allowed values by context:

from pydantic import BaseModel, SerializationInfo, field_serializer


class Model(BaseModel):
    text: str

    @field_serializer('text')
    def remove_stopwords(self, v: str, info: SerializationInfo):
        context = info.context
        if context:
            stopwords = context.get('stopwords', set())
            v = ' '.join(w for w in v.split() if w.lower() not in stopwords)
        return v


model = Model.model_construct(**{'text': 'This is an example document'})
print(model.model_dump())  # no context
#> {'text': 'This is an example document'}
print(model.model_dump(context={'stopwords': ['this', 'is', 'an']}))
#> {'text': 'example document'}
print(model.model_dump(context={'stopwords': ['document']}))
#> {'text': 'This is an example'}

Similarly, you can use a context for validation.

`model_copy(...)` ¶

API Documentation

pydantic.main.BaseModel.model_copy

model_copy() allows models to be duplicated (with optional updates), which is particularly useful when working with frozen models.

Example:

from pydantic import BaseModel


class BarModel(BaseModel):
    whatever: int


class FooBarModel(BaseModel):
    banana: float
    foo: str
    bar: BarModel


m = FooBarModel(banana=3.14, foo='hello', bar={'whatever': 123})

print(m.model_copy(update={'banana': 0}))
#> banana=0 foo='hello' bar=BarModel(whatever=123)
print(id(m.bar) == id(m.model_copy().bar))
#> True
# normal copy gives the same object reference for bar
print(id(m.bar) == id(m.model_copy(deep=True).bar))
#> False
# deep copy gives a new object reference for `bar`

Serialization

model.model_dump(...) ¶

model.model_dump_json(...) ¶

dict(model) and iteration¶

Custom serializers¶

Overriding the return type when dumping a model¶

Serializing subclasses¶

Subclasses of standard types¶

Subclass instances for fields of BaseModel, dataclasses, TypedDict¶

Serializing with duck-typing 🦆¶

SerializeAsAny annotation:¶

serialize_as_any runtime setting¶

Overriding the serialize_as_any default (False)¶

pickle.dumps(model)¶

Advanced include and exclude¶

Model- and field-level include and exclude¶

Serialization Context¶

model_copy(...) ¶

`model.model_dump(...)` ¶

`model.model_dump_json(...)` ¶

`dict(model)` and iteration¶

Subclass instances for fields of `BaseModel`, dataclasses, `TypedDict`¶

`SerializeAsAny` annotation:¶

`serialize_as_any` runtime setting¶

Overriding the `serialize_as_any` default (False)¶

`pickle.dumps(model)`¶

`model_copy(...)` ¶